Friday, November 20, 2020

Obvious out-of overspend


POTUS election 2020. "Fundraising by federal candidates: In previous presidential election cycles before the 2020 election, fundraising by Democrats and Republicans remained relatively even." From The Center for Responsive Politics (Open Secrets.org)
But the main image seen above - from the article - is only one of the amazing changes: look at the out-of-state donors to state-level candidates (donations of money coming in from a different state) and the Democrats have a 75% to 25% 'lead' (currently). This is clearly the ultra wealthy living in the Clinton Archipelago* trying to buy out the fly-over states/rust belt voters. I have personal anecdotes from colleagues and family in two of those states where the overt overspend was blatant and in both cases the Democrats still lost: they hadn't banked on an overwhelming turnout for Trump. Just as well then that the small donor portion of the overall also increased:
"Candidates for Congress and the presidency raised a combined $1.8 billion from small donors in the record-breaking 2020 election cycle. That's three times the 2016 total."

...with 45 percent of donations recieved for incumbent POTUS Donald Trump's coming from said voters giving USD200 of less. This is the best small-dollar showing for a Republican presidential candidate.  

In other snippets: [The Guardian] "That is, in a year when a black woman was on a major party ticket for the first time in US history, the margin between Democrats and Republicans among black women shifted 9 percentage points in the other direction – towards Trump."

Trump saw comparable gains with Black and Hispanic men as well. What changed in the racial and gender dynamics this cycle to produce these apparently extraordinary results? The truth is, absolutely nothing. These trends have been underway for the entirety of Trump’s public life.

Also, if Biden is actually certified - no, no, I mean the VOTE - it would mean that no fewer than ten bellwether counties lost their record: [including] Valencia County in NM and Vigo County IN, whose winning streaks go back to 1952 and 1956 respectively.

[added p.m.] Also, just looking at these totals provokes so many questions.

 * I looked back when I mentioned this in 2016 and was interested to see the date: that DJT had only recently been certified...3rd week of December 2016.

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Observing our obstriction...


What a wonderful image. Seen HERE on the Twitter feed of BabelColour @StuartHumphryes 

The picture is outside Mansion House, London in 1919. The post was from Remembrance Day yesterday: "101 years ago today: 11am on Tuesday 11th November 1919, crowds in London observe the very first 2 minute silence for those killed in the Great War. The men have removed their hats out of respect for the fallen. (I originally coloured this photo for the Evening Standard in 2019)."

Tuesday, November 10, 2020

Obvious overreaction; observing oligophrenia...


Below is a handy timeline for BBC, CCN, BoJo and other presumptive (maybe even foolish) media bods and never-Trumpers everywhere. I say presumptive because they couldn't possibly KNOW this but still report Biden as Preseident elect, could they? I mean, the source of the image is CNN...? Surely that wouldn't be telling us to accept a lie? To move on and ignore multiple rampant fraud red flags?

Saturday, November 07, 2020

Overabundance of oriflammes...


The oriflamme began as monastery banner in medieval France but became an instruction to give no mercy when "displayed on the battlefield, it indicated that no quarter was to be given" [Wiki]. Bear in mind that this wasn't a royal banner but the flag of a particular church, which "in early medieval France, served as regional administrative institutions in the absence of such from a central government." [Link, Wayback machine]. It was retired centuries ago; it was flown at Crecy, Poitiers and allegedly even Agincourt so I guess us English had a very large part in that retirement hehehe. 

Of course my point here is that it is a red flag and I am certainly not one to 'keep the red flag flying' but the mass of red flags already rasied in the 2020 POTUS election is getting to banana republic proportions. The BBC helpfully provided a list of some of the signs of vote rigging HERE, from a few years ago...on their Gabon, Africa pages. Suffice to say ALL those signs are more than evident so far this week. Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs: too many voters ("watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway. You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't", well in this election we've had a few counties over 100%. A high turnout in specific areas (yep, Milwaukee averaged 84% turnout in all areas, 80% for Biden...no, really). Then there's the large numbers of invalid votes, more votes than ballot papers issued, results that don't match (vote dumping), delay in announcing results...of course in that Gabon artice the BBC say for more than one of these issues:

"That's a good enough reason to cancel the result and arrange a re-run"...uh huh.

A better list HERE

  • The massive turn out alone is a red flag [given COVID and mail-in I would accept this as not quite a red flag.] 
  • The late night spikes that were enough to close all the Trump leads are a red flag. 
  • The statistically impossible breakdown of the ratios of these vote dumps is a red flag. 
  • The ratios of these dumps being far better than the percentages in the bluest of blue cities, even though the historical data does not match, red flag. 
  • The ratios of these vote dumps favoring Biden more in these few battlegrounds than the ratio for the rest of the country (even the bluest of the blue) red flag. 
  • Biden outperforming Obama among these few urban vote dumps, even though Trump picked up points in every demographic group in the rest of the country, red flag. 
  • The poll observers being removed. Red flag. 
  • The counters cheering as GOP observers are removed, red flag. 
  • The fact that the dem observers outnumber the GOP observers 3 to 1, red flag (and basis of the first lawsuit filed) 
  • The electioneering at the polls (on video), red flag. 
  • The willful violation of the court order requiring the separation of ballots by type, red flag. USPS whistleblower reporting to the Inspector General that today they were ordered to backdate ballots to yesterday, red flag. 
  • The video of 2 AM deliveries of what appear to be boxes of ballots with no chain of custody or other observers right before the late night miracle spikes, red flag.  

"Any of those things would be enough to trigger an audit in the normal world."...uh huh.

And I haven't even got onto the computer "glitches", all of which - as you may have guessed -  "go in the same direction". And then you have literal votedumping, not like the 'votedumping' link above where tranches of ballots turn up, just at the right time just the right amount and all for Biden...no, there is also LITERAL vote dumping.

What a clusterfuck, even deepest darkest Africa would be embarrassed by this...and all week the left-wing media (yep, that means most of the MSM) have been saying "Biden stopped short of declaring and outright win"...WTF? ...he CAN'T, he hasn't won yet so WHY say this? They are trying to create - in line with the Democrat party's efforts - the impression the creepy Joe is the honest winner and when  Trump - rightly - gets legal processes going to fight the multiple, widespread, major irregularities - is painted as the villain. Even the pictures of Biden in all the print media are now airbrushed, touched images trying to make him look presidential (he is not).  They are ALL complicit. If Biden wins this election has been stolen. Watered down Brexit and Trump removed in a coordinated coup, the WuHuFlu ...the globalists are fighting back with everything.

A fair ongoing summary of most of the above and more: Democrats Are Trying To Steal the US Presidential Election [*] on Freepress.ie

"Four years of the now debunked Russiagate hoax and nancy-pelosi’s [sic] impeachment witch-hunts have polarised the United states, via the media. This constant repetitive demonisation of a man who has done incredible good for the United states has achieved one very notable victory: it has summoned a willing army of accomplices to participate in massive election fraud... ...They have been condition to despise this man completely by the utterly biased mainstream media... ...Good people who have been conditioned to hate Donald Trump so much, they will go so far to lose their senses and aid in election fraud"

Hear hear!

[*] aided and abetted by an bias, corrupt media.

Saturday, October 31, 2020

October's over III...


Tonight is Halloween and it is also a full moon, the Hunter's Moon...spooky eh? No, it has to happen of course but the "last time this happened was back in 1944. And it will not happen again until 2039!" What I bet you didn't know is that when a full moon falls on Halloween it is ALWAYS a blue moon; it has to be. "The first full moon that follows the autumn equinox is called the Harvest Moon"..."Typically, the next full moon that follows the Harvest Moon is called the Hunter’s Moon. But this year it is also called a Blue Moon. As both events occur within the same month." [LINK] This latter relies on the 'modern tradition' of what is a blue moon, they always been something rare but not always just the second full moon within a calendar month, which is how we think of it [origin of the phrase].

In case you're wondering (and as per first link above) , yes, most of the full moons have names.
 
Update: Talking about the moon, I didn't realise until today that 'Operation Moonshot' (UK Gov's rapid turnaround coronavirus testing programme) has been quietly put down.

Saturday, October 24, 2020

Outing outbreak "opportunists"...


Please listen to this interview with Dr. Mike Yeadon. That link is to YouTube, also HERE on James Delingpole's Podbean. "The first social media pandemic".
"Dr Mike Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology, a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research in the pharmaceuticals industry, and founded his own biotech company which he sold to the world’s biggest drug company Novartis in 2017. He talks to James about his devastating paper What SAGE has Got Wrong (https://lockdownsceptics.org/what-sage-got-wrong/) in which he says that the Covid pandemic is over, that there will be no Second Wave, that we have already achieved herd immunity and that Sir Patrick Vallance, Britain’s Chief Scientific Adviser, is a liar and that the vaccine is more or less a waste of time. He doesn’t pull his punches"

COVID heavy (obviously!), some research, some science, some immunology, some health...ALL searchable sourceable and all outing the lying sods we having maintaining the casedemic. He does a wonderful and easy to understand job of exposing the absolute scam that has been thrust upon us. 

There is NO doubt about this. We are being lied to. Crimes have been commited.

Image by Steve Bright (here on Twitter)

Friday, October 23, 2020

"Otherwise objectionable" otiose?...


Is the excuse/get out of gaol free card/interpretation that Twitter and Facebook use - as they claim innocence due to their being only platforms and not publishers - about to be made redundant? From the Federal Communications Commission's website: FCC General Counsel Thomas M. Johnson Jr. writes "Last week, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his intent to move forward with a rulemaking to interpret Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. Under certain circumstances, Section 230 provides websites, including social media companies, that host or moderate content generated by others with immunity from liability."
"Section 230 provides, among other things, that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." It further provides that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of . . . any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.""

What constitutes material that can be excluded as 'otherwise objectionable'? Well we know that, anything that helps president Trump and/or is a bombshell against a Democrat, most recently Biden and 'the laptop from Hell' to quote The Donald. 

There are critics on both sides, an not just from the 'Orange Man Bad' crew. I heard about it from Dan

Otherwise objectionable gear from: Techdirt 

Update:  'Tech Censorship Is on a Dangerous Path' writes Armstrong Williams at The Daily Signal [LINK]: "The titans of social media, Dorsey at Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook... [  ]...want to control what the public sees, which enables them to better monitor and, ultimately, influence every aspect of society and life. It is akin to China’s "free speech elite,"...[  ] " As we move closer to stifling free speech and elevating only the viewpoints desired by the Silicon Valley elite, let us remember the words of James Madison:

"Our First Amendment freedoms give us the right to think what we like and say what we please. And if we the people are to govern ourselves, we must have these rights, even if they are misused by the minority. We can never lose sight of this because the moment we do will be the moment we cease to be free.""

Sunday, October 18, 2020

Other outbreak oblocutors...


"You know nothing John Snow" is probably what he was told: John Snow, the British physician who 'first determined that cholera spread through contaminated water'; he wasn't sure how but he was right; he also had many naysayers and detractors.[{typo edit} Interestingly the sadly MIA blogger Raedwald mentioned him back in April:

"We must keep exposing the manifold failures of the central Whitehall machine. They are costing lives." 

 Anyhoo...the reason for John Snow the mention is that The Great Barrington Declaration has a rival: The John Snow Memorandum. A couple of days ago Lockdown Skeptics debunked a lot of it and today they ask "Who are the Real Heirs of John Snow in the Herd Immunity Debate?

"The conventional wisdom at the time – the view held by the scientific establishment – was the miasma theory, which held that diseases such as cholera and bubonic plague were caused by pollution or “bad air”. Instead of relying on this theory, Snow actually did some on-the-ground research, talking to local residents and analysing the pattern of infection. In this way, he was able to trace the source of the outbreak to a water pump in Broad Street and end the epidemic. Snow’s discovery, which came about because he engaged in methodical, empirical research rather than relying on some divorced-from-reality theory, is regarded as the founding event of the science of epidemiology. For a group of establishment panjandrums to invoke John Snow’s name, given that their entire approach to the pandemic is rooted in abstract mathematical modelling, is almost laughably inappropriate."

That said, he did order the handle of the 'Broad Street Pump' to be removed so as to avoid the residents drinking the water; I suppose that could be construed as an early 'lockdown restriction' couldn't it? 

More good stuff  HERE from Robert E. Wright at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) ['What?' I hear you murmour...no worries, he's a historian].

"In case my fancy words remain unclear, I am saying that the public health officials who do not understand the correct policy response to covid, represented by the Great Barrington Declaration, fail to do so because they have not studied the history of science or even medicine in sufficient detail to understand the scientific method. They are too ignorant to be humble. Case in point, John Snow himself would have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, not the John Snow Declaration."
Finally, a few choice words from Dr. Atlas Scott [great name!], who when interviewed had some ghastly and wrrying statistics e.g. "[in the USA]...an astonishing 25.5 percent of people between 18 and 24 contemplated suicide in the month of June alone" WTF? Lockdown's a winner...NOT!
"History will record the faces of the public health expertise as some of the most sinful, egregious, epic failures in the history of public policy. They have killed people with their lack of understanding and their lack of caring about not just the impact of cases of COVID-19, a virus that the overwhelming majority of people do well in. They never cared to considered the impact of the policy itself, and the policy itself has been a complete epic failure, and honestly some people say a crime against humanity — these people should be held accountable for what they did."
Winter is Coming.