Ongoing Ottoman onslaught...

---

Click to enlarge; from Walk Free Global Slavery Index

No longer Ottoman but 'Turkey Is First in Europe for Modern Slavery'. 

More excellent writing and eye-opening facts from A. C. Rosenthal [Link: on Substack]. 

The Walk Free Foundation's Global Slavery Index [LINK]; Turkey ranked fifth in the world. 

Shocking, as AC Rosenthal highlights: 

 "Not fifth in its region. Not fifth in the developing world. Fifth on earth, behind only North Korea, Eritrea, Mauritania, and Saudi Arabia." 

And of course that constantly undemocratic, death-spiralling, madhouse-led E.U. seems desperate to see them fully inside the city walls.

Official opposition: Olukemi Olufunto...

---

Well done Kemi. You should have won before when Liz Truss won, she began well but was shafted by TPTB (no, not tetraphenylphosphonium tetraphenylborate) to get slimy Sunak in. 

Now you have your chance: please be the Conservative you are, not the continuity lefty direction uniparty opposition leader that Gove et al want you to be. 

You MUST push for strict immigration control and defusing the rampant bias that Islam enjoys: further Islamification is a no-no. Shut their shit down. And Starmer is a dangerous zealot, make sure he is exposed. 

Update 6 p.m.: A good read on UNHERD by Tom McTague that may interest waverers (me for one!)

Oratory of obfuscation...obviously...

---

Yes I am a bit behind but that's what happens when you're a working day behind, although Twitter helps. Kier Starmer could have made it, he could have built on the [nauseatingly] choreographed 'hit the ground running' start to his PM-ship but he blew it big time; in the most obvious and predicted way (by just about everyone with their 'buzz word bingo card' handy, I was correct on a couple of the main points). 

It is exactly as Frank Haviland says in his latest article on The New Conservative: Starmer Picks a Side.

"...Starmer who has painted himself as the leader for our times would surely have brought his finest pallette and brush to the lectern? Certainly, he did. And no doubt for the faithful, his painting by numbers routine did the job." For those of us on the other side of the political divide however – the tens of millions of small ‘c’ conservative, closed-borders fetishist, ‘far-right’ thugs, with ridiculous aspirations that our daughters might be permitted to live – his performance was even worse than expected. [my emphasis]

"Rather than oratory for the ages, I’d call this dereliction of duty – a textbook display of obfuscation, memorable only for what was not said, rather than that which was. There was no mention of ‘children’, ‘protection’, ‘border security’, ‘failed multiculturalism’ or ‘integration’. The idea that this speech will install calm, reassure the public, or prevent future atrocities is about as close to zero as you can get. This was about Starmer doing what he does best: reassuring those who vote the right way, and blaming the response to crime, rather than the crime itself."

And like Frank writes to summarise, many I predicted that 'Labour’s honeymoon would be short-lived' – "it’s now officially over." Spot on.

Silkie Carlo, Director of Big Brother Watch said:

"It’s deeply worrying that the Prime Minister totally failed to address the causes of the violent, racist thuggery we have witnessed in Britain this week, let alone his failure to even address the causes of the heinous knife crime that has cruelly taken so many lives. To promise the country ineffective AI surveillance in these circumstances was frankly tone deaf and will give the public absolutely no confidence that this government has the competence or conviction to get tough on the causes of these crimes and protect the public."

Obloquy over obvious opposition of our orthodoxy...

---

...or, what a disgrace the BBC continues to prove themselves to be: Surprise, surprise! Next BBC Religion Editor is yet another Muslim, so "The last three people in charge of religious broadcasting and a commissioning editor appointed by the BBC have been British Asians, three of them Muslims and one from a Muslim family."...bit of a coincidence nothing more; no conspiracy to see here, they were the best qualified for the job, honest!

"It could be seen as a deliberate expression of the scorn which those in the upper echelons of the BBC hold towards Christianity and the British values which come from it, and the promotion and normalisation of Islam."

...writes Dr Campbell Campbell-Jack on The Conservative Woman. Yes, it 'could'. 

Dr. Campbell-Jack is a retired Presbyterian minister so has a dog in the fight I would say but to be honest this should piss us all off and is just typical of the anti-British BBC whose bias is becoming legendary; they simply hate all and everything about the U.K. and especially England. Fuck 'em. 

I suppose the new guy could be a Christian, right? After all, he did walk The Road to Bethlehem, "from Nazareth to Bethlehem, retracing a journey made by Joseph and Mary in the New Testament story of Jesus' birth". More than most Christians! The diary of that journey makes for genuinely interesting reading and Aleem was mistaken as both a Jewish settler and a Palestinian "and so, perhaps, a potential attacker". 

But no, Aleem Maqbool is a very Urdu name and as a previous Pakistan Correspondent (and Gaza/West Bank Correspondent) I'm sure he is in fact...yep,  a Muslim. And reading his BLM love-in (mainly Melina Abdullah quotes) you just know he'll fit in perfectly. 

The BBC tell us  Aleem will take up the new position in Spring 2022, presumably just in time for the Census 21 results [ONS UK Gov] so we'll be able to see how the Muslim population in the UK has grown (yes, I know we won't) but it'll highlight the BBC's fuckwittery. Why not rotate the role? Why not appoint a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Sikh a 'no stated religion' or even - God forbid - a Christian?!!

Obloquy over obvious opposition of our orthodoxy...

---

...or, what a disgrace the BBC continues to prove themselves to be: Surprise, surprise! Next BBC Religion Editor is yet another Muslim, so "The last three people in charge of religious broadcasting and a commissioning editor appointed by the BBC have been British Asians, three of them Muslims and one from a Muslim family."...bit of a coincidence nothing more; no conspiracy to see here, they were the best qualified for the job, honest!

"It could be seen as a deliberate expression of the scorn which those in the upper echelons of the BBC hold towards Christianity and the British values which come from it, and the promotion and normalisation of Islam."

...writes Dr Campbell Campbell-Jack on The Conservative Woman. Yes, it 'could'. 

Dr. Campbell-Jack is a retired Presbyterian minister so has a dog in the fight I would say but to be honest this should piss us all off and is just typical of the anti-British BBC whose bias is becoming legendary; they simply hate all and everything about the U.K. and especially England. Fuck 'em. 

I suppose the new guy could be a Christian, right? After all, he did walk The Road to Bethlehem, "from Nazareth to Bethlehem, retracing a journey made by Joseph and Mary in the New Testament story of Jesus' birth". More than most Christians! The diary of that journey makes for genuinely interesting reading and Aleem was mistaken as both a Jewish settler and a Palestinian "and so, perhaps, a potential attacker". 

But no, Aleem Maqbool is a very Urdu name and as a previous Pakistan Correspondent (and Gaza/West Bank Correspondent) I'm sure he is in fact...yep,  a Muslim. And reading his BLM love-in (mainly Melina Abdullah quotes) you just know he'll fit in perfectly. 

The BBC tell us  Aleem will take up the new position in Spring 2022, presumably just in time for the Census 21 results [ONS UK Gov] so we'll be able to see how the Muslim population in the UK has grown (yes, I know we won't) but it'll highlight the BBC's fuckwittery. Why not rotate the role? Why not appoint a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Sikh a 'no stated religion' or even - God forbid - a Christian?!!

Oval onomatomania over onomatophobia...

---

I am getting the irresistible urge to repeat certain words; Crusaders, Crusaders CRUSADERS. This is because of recent perceived fear of certain words...maybe. Super Rugby's Crusaders are by far and away - on present form - the best club in the world*. HOWEVER, "The Canterbury Crusaders are to lose their knight and sword logo following a review into the club's branding after the Christchurch mosque attacks in March". Now, apparently, the head of New Zealand Rugby Steve Tew said: "Even prior to 15 March, the Crusaders had signalled their intention to complete a brand review. While the events of 15 March have accelerated and escalated that brand review, we do not want this to be solely a response to that tragic event." Also,

"Any change must not be seen as a knee-jerk reaction to a single event."...OK; trouble is it sounds exactly like a knee-jerk reaction to a single event.

I don't know about you but when I see the logo I do not think of medieval European knights chopping up Muslims, no really, I don't. When the Canterbury kiwis originally chose the 'Crusaders' name it was based on the English nature of the city of Christchurch: [LINK: What's in a name (archived page)] "They believed the name Crusaders not only connected with Christchurch's British heritage but it defined the crusading spirit of Canterbury rugby." They have a theme song too: the "Conquest of Paradise" (Vangelis). My God, the Maori's won't like that will they? Their paradise was afterall conquested. And Canterbury in England means "stronghold of the Kentish men"! No! They'll have to change the city name too I guess, all that stronghold stuff could make people think of fighting and killing.



Now, juxtapose this rugby story with another rugby story: 'Israel Folau launches legal action over rugby sacking' [LINK] "No Australian of any faith should be fired for practising their religion," Folau said. Does anyone think, even for a nano-second, that if he were a Muslim and said the exact same words, i.e. that God's plan for gay people was “HELL…Unless they repent of their sins and turn to God”, he would be sacked...anyone?



* In England the Exeter Chiefs and Saracens will have to watch out...actually, no, Saracens won't, will they? I mean God forbid some may recall it as a term [Wiki] not just for for Muslim or Arab but with
connotations: on a military mission, or sāriq, pl. sariqīn: "thief, marauder, plunderer"!

Oval onomatomania over onomatophobia...

---

I am getting the irresistible urge to repeat certain words; Crusaders, Crusaders CRUSADERS. This is because of recent perceived fear of certain words...maybe. Super Rugby's Crusaders are by far and away - on present form - the best club in the world*. HOWEVER, "The Canterbury Crusaders are to lose their knight and sword logo following a review into the club's branding after the Christchurch mosque attacks in March". Now, apparently, the head of New Zealand Rugby Steve Tew said: "Even prior to 15 March, the Crusaders had signalled their intention to complete a brand review. While the events of 15 March have accelerated and escalated that brand review, we do not want this to be solely a response to that tragic event." Also,

"Any change must not be seen as a knee-jerk reaction to a single event."...OK; trouble is it sounds exactly like a knee-jerk reaction to a single event.

I don't know about you but when I see the logo I do not think of medieval European knights chopping up Muslims, no really, I don't. When the Canterbury kiwis originally chose the 'Crusaders' name it was based on the English nature of the city of Christchurch: [LINK: What's in a name (archived page)] "They believed the name Crusaders not only connected with Christchurch's British heritage but it defined the crusading spirit of Canterbury rugby." They have a theme song too: the "Conquest of Paradise" (Vangelis). My God, the Maori's won't like that will they? Their paradise was afterall conquested. And Canterbury in England means "stronghold of the Kentish men"! No! They'll have to change the city name too I guess, all that stronghold stuff could make people think of fighting and killing.

Now, juxtapose this rugby story with another rugby story: 'Israel Folau launches legal action over rugby sacking' [LINK] "No Australian of any faith should be fired for practising their religion," Folau said. Does anyone think, even for a nano-second, that if he were a Muslim and said the exact same words, i.e. that God's plan for gay people was “HELL…Unless they repent of their sins and turn to God”, he would be sacked...anyone?

* In England the Exeter Chiefs and Saracens will have to watch out...actually, no, Saracens won't, will they? I mean God forbid some may recall it as a term [Wiki] not just for for Muslim or Arab but with connotations: on a military mission, or sāriq, pl. sariqīn: "thief, marauder, plunderer"!

Obloquy of obedientiary objicients II...

---

I seriosuly doubted the authenticity of this leaflet; I was convinced the UK Armed Forces couldn't have fallen so far. How wrong I was [DM link] "A guide to help high-ranking British officers spot right-wing extremists in their ranks has been leaked"... ...The document, which an MoD spokesperson confirmed to MailOnline". FFS.

More than half those 'indicators & warnings' are ridiculous (my comments in last week's post on this)

Obloquy of obedientiary objicients II...

---

I seriosuly doubted the authenticity of this leaflet; I was convinced the UK Armed Forces couldn't have fallen so far. How wrong I was [DM link] "A guide to help high-ranking British officers spot right-wing extremists in their ranks has been leaked"... ...The document, which an MoD spokesperson confirmed to MailOnline". FFS.

More than half those 'indicators & warnings' are ridiculous (my comments in last week's post on this)

Obloquy of obedientiary objicients...

---

ZeroHedge with a shocker: (hat-tip Cascadian).  I am seriosuly doubting the authenticity as surely the UK Armed Forces haven't fallen so far; we know many of the higher ranks are already lost to Common Purpose and
lefty PC shite but it looks like they're starting to double down on infecting the ranks: "The British Army has allegedly distributed a cheat sheet of "indicators & warnings" if one suspects that they (or a friend) might be a member of the "Extreme Right Wing" (XRW)." IMHO, the selected points from the list that I have written below covers a good part of the country and especially Brexiteers; I have added my comments in brown font to a number of indicators which I feel are most worrying:

Describe themselves as
"Patriots". Really?

Add 'istan' to British place names.  That would be the well
accepted Londistan anyone? A name given orginally by the French security services due to the
UK's foolish acceptance and protection of known terrorists. 

Describe multicultural towns as 'lost'. I would decribe some "multicultural" towns as fast becoming monoculture, and it ain’t ‘Anglo’ anything.

Look at opponents as 'Traitors'. Eh? Have you
been paying attention? Working for the interests of a foreign power at the
detriment to one’s own country is possibly the perfect definition of Treachery! This would be
most of our current MPs.

Use the term 'Islamofascism'.
Perfectly describes what it is describing.

Become increasingly angry at perceived injustices or threats to so called 'National Identity'. You should really bend over backwards or stretch
your neck out, they are implying, no?

Make generalisations about Muslims and Jews. I believe the word
“Jews” is added to disguise what they are really on about.

Claim that immigration is the root of injustices
against vulnerable people (e.g. old age pensioners, veterans). Note the
wording. Immigration is CLEARLY part of the problem but “injustices against
vulnerable people” added to make their real message just a bit more hidden: they mean
“if you want any sort of immigration control you are XRW”. 

Involve colleagues in closed
social media groups. Heaven forbid!!

Refer to Political Correctness as
some left wing or communist plot. It is, you stupid idiots! The roots of PC are traced back to exactly that! Or should I call you
‘useful idiots’.

Make inaccurate generalisations
about 'the Left' or Government. Covers most of the country although mainly
accurate comments are used.

Use blatantly untruthful or incorrect references
to immigrants, Judaism or Islam. Note the wording again: “blatantly untruthful”;
they do not mean this, they mean any references that highlight anything bad about Islam. Again, note Judaism added again to disguise their aim.

Talk of an impending racial conflict or 'Race
War'. You dumb fuckers: it is YOU, the writers and publishers of this list of 'indicators & warnings' that is causing it and accelerating its
arrival!

OK, when can I expect the knock on the door? Maybe at 3 a.m.? 



[Update 10 a.m.] Just heard that the mentions of Jew and Judaism could be referring to the Labour party's blatant, constant and growing anti-Semitism; I do not think so, if they did mean that the creators of 'indicators & warnings' will have to explain their left-wing/far right error. Fascism, Nazism etc are very obviously LEFT wing; if you need it explaining e-mail me or do some reading.

Obloquy of obedientiary objicients...

---

ZeroHedge with a shocker: (hat-tip Cascadian).  I am seriosuly doubting the authenticity as surely the UK Armed Forces haven't fallen so far; we know many of the higher ranks are already lost to Common Purpose and lefty PC shite but it looks like they're starting to double down on infecting the ranks: "The British Army has allegedly distributed a cheat sheet of "indicators & warnings" if one suspects that they (or a friend) might be a member of the "Extreme Right Wing" (XRW)." IMHO, the selected points from the list that I have written below covers a good part of the country and especially Brexiteers; I have added my comments in brown font to a number of indicators which I feel are most worrying:

Describe themselves as "Patriots". Really?

Add 'istan' to British place names.  That would be the well accepted Londistan anyone? A name given orginally by the French security services due to the UK's foolish acceptance and protection of known terrorists. 
Describe multicultural towns as 'lost'. I would decribe some "multicultural" towns as fast becoming monoculture, and it ain’t ‘Anglo’ anything.

Look at opponents as 'Traitors'. Eh? Have you been paying attention? Working for the interests of a foreign power at the detriment to one’s own country is possibly the perfect definition of Treachery! This would be most of our current MPs.

Use the term 'Islamofascism'. Perfectly describes what it is describing.

Become increasingly angry at perceived injustices or threats to so called 'National Identity'. You should really bend over backwards or stretch your neck out, they are implying, no?

Make generalisations about Muslims and Jews. I believe the word “Jews” is added to disguise what they are really on about.

Claim that immigration is the root of injustices against vulnerable people (e.g. old age pensioners, veterans). Note the wording. Immigration is CLEARLY part of the problem but “injustices against vulnerable people” added to make their real message just a bit more hidden: they mean “if you want any sort of immigration control you are XRW”. 
Involve colleagues in closed social media groups. Heaven forbid!!

Refer to Political Correctness as some left wing or communist plot. It is, you stupid idiots! The roots of PC are traced back to exactly that! Or should I call you ‘useful idiots’.

Make inaccurate generalisations about 'the Left' or Government. Covers most of the country although mainly accurate comments are used.

Use blatantly untruthful or incorrect references to immigrants, Judaism or Islam. Note the wording again: “blatantly untruthful”; they do not mean this, they mean any references that highlight anything bad about Islam. Again, note Judaism added again to disguise their aim.

Talk of an impending racial conflict or 'Race War'. You dumb fuckers: it is YOU, the writers and publishers of this list of 'indicators & warnings' that is causing it and accelerating its arrival!

OK, when can I expect the knock on the door? Maybe at 3 a.m.? 

[Update 10 a.m.] Just heard that the mentions of Jew and Judaism could be referring to the Labour party's blatant, constant and growing anti-Semitism; I do not think so, if they did mean that the creators of 'indicators & warnings' will have to explain their left-wing/far right error. Fascism, Nazism etc are very obviously LEFT wing; if you need it explaining e-mail me or do some reading.

Omniloquent observer opines on our obscurantic omphaloskepsis...

---

Brendan O'Neill on the button again, in Spiked-online "In 2017, our response to terrorism became dangerously passive."... "2017 might prove to be the year we caved in to terrorism.". Writing about the official response and our own response.

"In 2017 we witnessed the rise of the terror amnesia industry – an informal but effective effort by the political class and opinion-forming set to shush serious discussion about terrorism; to tame strong emotions post-terror; to make people forget, in essence, the latest bloody destruction of their fellow citizens, or at least stop thinking about it. 'Don't look back…'"

'The terror amnesia industry', yes indeed. The immediate 'Beware of backlash', 'Beware of Islamophobia', the hiding of facts the under-reporting or omission of facts...and in fact the over-reporting and highlighting of anything to deflect attention.

"This is how deeply the West’s moral cowardice now runs: we are not even permitted to name the ideology that motors the murder of our fellow citizens...."A nation that fails to get angry about the slaughter of its children, and which won’t even allow frank discussion about the ideology used to justify that slaughter, is a nation that has lost its moral anchor.

So very true. 

Omniloquent observer opines on our obscurantic omphaloskepsis...

---

Brendan O'Neill on the button again, in Spiked-online "In 2017, our response to terrorism became dangerously passive."... "2017 might prove to be the year we caved in to terrorism.". Writing about the official response and our own response.

"In 2017 we witnessed the rise of the terror amnesia industry – an informal but effective effort by the political class and opinion-forming set to shush serious discussion about terrorism; to tame strong emotions post-terror; to make people forget, in essence, the latest bloody destruction of their fellow citizens, or at least stop thinking about it. 'Don't look back…'"

'The terror amnesia industry', yes indeed. The immediate 'Beware of backlash', 'Beware of Islamophobia', the hiding of facts the under-reporting or omission of facts...and in fact the over-reporting and highlighting of anything to deflect attention.

"This is how deeply the West’s moral cowardice now runs: we are not even permitted to name the ideology that motors the murder of our fellow citizens...."A nation that fails to get angry about the slaughter of its children, and which won’t even allow frank discussion about the ideology used to justify that slaughter, is a nation that has lost its moral anchor.

So very true. 

Outgoing Obama's outrageous outrecuidance...

---

O to go...

Battling for position as current number one threat to world peace? IMHO Obama must be in with a chance: just WTF is he on? Crazy lame duck domestic policies [like putting between 1.5 and 2 million MORE acres under federal control in Utah and Nevada - remember they own most of Nevada anyway and over half of Utah (expect rebellious locals NOT to be happy...again), no vote, no debate] are almost expected of this most petulant of POTUS but on Israel (no surprise?) and on Russia (sassed) he is playing a very odd and dangerous game. He is also bringing thousands more Muslims at the same time as dismantling the post 9/11 registry for Muslims.



Jan 20th can't come soon enough.



outrecuidance: n. - egomania; gross conceit (as ever, from Luciferous Logolepsy: "dragging obscure words into the light of day".



Update: "I’m a former lifelong Democrat, stating here a clear and incontestable fact: Barack Obama is a failed President." [LINK]; lots of detail.

Outgoing Obama's outrageous outrecuidance...

---

O to go...

Battling for position as current number one threat to world peace? IMHO Obama must be in with a chance: just WTF is he on? Crazy lame duck domestic policies [like putting between 1.5 and 2 million MORE acres under federal control in Utah and Nevada - remember they own most of Nevada anyway and over half of Utah (expect rebellious locals NOT to be happy...again), no vote, no debate] are almost expected of this most petulant of POTUS but on Israel (no surprise?) and on Russia (sassed) he is playing a very odd and dangerous game. He is also bringing thousands more Muslims at the same time as dismantling the post 9/11 registry for Muslims.

Jan 20th can't come soon enough.

outrecuidance: n. - egomania; gross conceit (as ever, from Luciferous Logolepsy: "dragging obscure words into the light of day".

Update: "I’m a former lifelong Democrat, stating here a clear and incontestable fact: Barack Obama is a failed President." [LINK]; lots of detail.

Obvious oppression...

---

Another excellent post from Raedwald this morning about UK opinions on a burka ban: "The ban would enjoy wider support if it were not portrayed as a racist assault on Moslems rather than a measure to ensure equity, justice and fairness."

"The Hijab and Chadoor (1 and 2 above) are really no different to a nun's wimple - or to the sight of all women in a catholic church wearing headscarves to cover their hair, a sight I remember well from youth. However, it is the Niqab and the Burka (3 and 4) that cause real problems.

What is the biggest cohort of unemployed persons in Britain? Moslem women. The unemployment rate - and therefore poverty, disadvantage, poor health, disease, deprivation and exclusion - amongst Moslem women is sky-high."...




Interestingly - from the Telegraph link in Raedwald's post - the poll findings were almost along Brexit lines: "The only age group to oppose a ban was the 18-24-year-olds, while all others were in favour, with the oldest 65+ group backing the prohibition by an overwhelming 78 per cent to 12".  Yet another reason to keep those under 25 years old from being allowed to vote. :-)

Obvious oppression...

---

Another excellent post from Raedwald this morning about UK opinions on a burka ban: "The ban would enjoy wider support if it were not portrayed as a racist assault on Moslems rather than a measure to ensure equity, justice and fairness."

"The Hijab and Chadoor (1 and 2 above) are really no different to a nun's wimple - or to the sight of all women in a catholic church wearing headscarves to cover their hair, a sight I remember well from youth. However, it is the Niqab and the Burka (3 and 4) that cause real problems. What is the biggest cohort of unemployed persons in Britain? Moslem women. The unemployment rate - and therefore poverty, disadvantage, poor health, disease, deprivation and exclusion - amongst Moslem women is sky-high."...

Interestingly - from the Telegraph link in Raedwald's post - the poll findings were almost along Brexit lines: "The only age group to oppose a ban was the 18-24-year-olds, while all others were in favour, with the oldest 65+ group backing the prohibition by an overwhelming 78 per cent to 12".  Yet another reason to keep those under 25 years old from being allowed to vote. :-)

Outstanding...

---

Presumably it's Death Row?

Outstanding...

---

Presumably it's Death Row?

Outrageous or obvious?...

---

From the DT: "Nigel Farage: Migrants could pose sex attack threat to Britain". 'Women may be at a particular risk from the "cultural" differences between British society and migrants' [Link]. What he says is perfectly true and blatantly obvious, especially when we know what happened in Cologne, Germany where gangs of immigrants - all young men - sexually abused hundreds of women last New Year’s Eve. What really irks me is that even now the Telegraph says "allegedly"...so does the BBC but you'd expect it from them. In the BBC link Treasury minister Andrea Leadsom - amongst others ('sunk to new depths', 'disgraceful') - is calling Farage's comments 'outrageous'.



What is in fact REALLY outrageous is that we have had THOUSANDS of such cases here in the UK already, worse: rape of children, drugged and abused and passed around between groups of pervert scum; ignored and swept under the carpet for over TEN YEARS (we know it is at least 2 or 3 decades of Muslim abuse: "it appears that racially motivated grooming of girls stems from 1990s onwards and is being underplayed by the media and politicians fearing political correctness.") by Police, social workers, council employees etc. Rotherham is the most infamous but there's Derby, Rochdale, Telford, Keighley and more; or further south Peterborough, Banbury, Bristol, Oxford, Aylesbury...and more; you'd think they would have noticed.

Apologies if this offends anyone: unfortunately the caption underneath is 100% true. 

The press ignored it too, similar to Cologne where the press was told not to report on the Cologne attacks. Sinister. So, it isn't outrageous for Farage to say this: it is stating the bloody obvious. This and dozens (probably hundreds) of cases are happening every day, across Europe: the common denominator - apart from Islam - is the attempts to hide it, to cover it up. Sweden in particular for well over a decade: when they realised their crime figures pointed to the clear and obvious over-representation (by miles) of Muslim (yes, it has to be said) immigrants they did what? Clamp down? No. Mass arrest? No...they stopped publishing the crime stats!



You might think the UK problem was mainly Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Somali and those that are coming are predominantly Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi but unfortunately I doubt it's entirely the rural/izzat thing: they are already fighting each other over child abuse! "Afghan and Pakistani migrants have fought each other, rioted and burnt down brand new accommodation on the Greek Island of Lesbos after the two ethnic groups accused each other of molesting children and stealing."



Jesus Wept.