Ongoing outing of Obama...

---

Hope - [nope] - dope - dupe...and so it went. 

The continued outing of oppressive Obama is a good thing. It needed to happen; the festering wound needs opening and cleansing. Anyone still bothered to come here knows of my multiple attempts. The best (IMHO, LOL) was from just under 12 years ago, Sept 2013. Also, considering the current revelations, we knew immediately in Trump's first term about the Obama 'stay behind army' of activists and agitators in the US governing apparatus. 

This blogpost is all words of others, the ever excellent Mikki Willis of Plandemic fame (mikkiwillis.com) and hat-tip to Robert W Malone's Substack: My Tribe is Small. 

There is a handy list of Obama's "'accomplishments.' Tell me again why he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize?" (a prize I might add that was awarded only 9 months into his first term, meaning that taking into account the months of planning and decision-making this was obviously was a prize crowbarred in to fit a narrative, e.g. a total fraud.) 

Looking back, Obama wasn’t the antidote to a broken system; he was the system perfected - wrapped in charm, eloquence, and just enough illusion to keep hope alive while the country’s foundations were quietly hollowed out. In the end, he didn’t heal old wounds - he deepened them, weaponized them, and left us more divided, distracted, and disillusioned than before.

And much more...

Oppressed obedience...

---

Great article from the bad cat: [LINK] 

how we got to here 

how moral relativism destroyed sanity and how objectivity can bring it back [sic] 

"all this division and vilification and rage farming is coming from somewhere, and it really is new over the last 15 years or so."

"it's an iterative negative sum game where to stay on top, you always need to be "more oppressed than thou" and so it rapidly selects for the most broken, damaged, and bereft people and shunts them to the top by acting as though they are somehow virtuous for being disastrous human failures."

  i mean, how can that possibly end save the calamity of rule by the mentally ill?

Obmutescent over outrageous obsequious obfuscation II...

---

As a quick follow up to Obmutescent over outrageous obsequious obfuscation we have loud and clear what Black Lives Matter is, in their own words, how is it possible that the English Premier League clubs and players are openly supporting this? Again my emphasis:

Black Lives Matter UK (BLMUK) is a coalition of black activists and organisers across the UK. We’ve been organising since 2016 for justice in our communities.
We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism, white-supremacy, patriarchy and the state structures that disproportionately harm black people in Britain and around the world. We build deep relationships across the diaspora and strategise to challenge the rise of the authoritarian right-wing across the world, from Brazil to Britain.

There is a lot more description and explanation on their GoFundMe page HERE where they have raised approaching 1 million quid in the last week. obviously I put that link not so you donate to this travesty but so you see it is real.



I repeat, how is it possible that the English Premier League clubs and players are openly supporting this? 

Obmutescent over outrageous obsequious obfuscation II...

---

As a quick follow up to Obmutescent over outrageous obsequious obfuscation we have loud and clear what Black Lives Matter is, in their own words, how is it possible that the English Premier League clubs and players are openly supporting this? Again my emphasis:

Black Lives Matter UK (BLMUK) is a coalition of black activists and organisers across the UK. We’ve been organising since 2016 for justice in our communities. We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism, white-supremacy, patriarchy and the state structures that disproportionately harm black people in Britain and around the world. We build deep relationships across the diaspora and strategise to challenge the rise of the authoritarian right-wing across the world, from Brazil to Britain.

There is a lot more description and explanation on their GoFundMe page HERE where they have raised approaching 1 million quid in the last week. obviously I put that link not so you donate to this travesty but so you see it is real.

I repeat, how is it possible that the English Premier League clubs and players are openly supporting this? 

Obmutescent over outrageous obsequious obfuscation...

---

Watched some footy last night; it was my last time for a while at least. I was, to say the least, stunned. I should have realised the other day, seeing the Liverfluke players taking a knee and other dim-witted overpaid fuckwits too: English Premier League players' names on the back of their shirts won't appear; the political divisive and sinister 'Black Lives Matter' will appear for 12 matches of the recently (yesterday) restarted season. After that, a 'Black Lives Matter' badge will be displayed for the rest of the season alongside another badge thanking NHS staff. All 20 EPL clubs are committed to "a global society of inclusion, respect, and equal opportunities for all, regardless of their colour or creed". Great, laudable, marvellous...but what does that have to do with BLM?

Premier League kneels to the BLM tyrants, writes Gary Oliver on Conservative Woman. he is not wrong.

"Nonetheless, players who kneel in solidarity with teammates cannot all be comfortable endorsing the malevolent manifesto of Black Lives Matter. Certainly many football supporters will be dismayed by their club’s shirts being used to promote a group which denigrates British history and whose benign name belies its menacing intent."

Laws of the Game and Football Rules [English Football Association] IFAB Laws of the Game 2019-20, 20/21 [International Football Association Board]

Law 4: The Players' Equipment, Section 5:

Slogans, statements, images and advertising:
Interpreting the Law

When interpreting whether a slogan, statement or image is permissible... 

... 'political' is less clear but slogans, statements or images related to the following are not permitted:

any person(s), living or dead (unless part of the official competition name)

any local, regional, national or international political party/organisation/group, etc.

any local, regional or national government or any of its departments, offices or functions

any organisation which is discriminatory

any organisation whose aims/actions are likely to offend a notable number of people

any specific political act/even

When commemorating a significant national or
international event, the sensibilities of the opposing team (including
its supporters) and the general public should be carefully considered.

Competition rules may contain further
restrictions/limitations, particularly in relation to the size, number
and position of permitted slogans, statements and images. It is
recommended that disputes relating to slogans, statements or images be
resolved prior to a match/competition taking place."

My emphasis. They can change the laws but they are currently ignoring them and in a way that is grossly and overtly political and divisive.  

BLM may have had good intentions when it began but that beginning was based on lies and race-baiters: Obama's "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon". Just one example: "While it would be naïve to suggest that there is no racism in the US
criminal justice system, victim reports don’t support the idea that this
is because of mass discrimination" [LINK]. BLM also believe in the disruption of "the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure". FFS, when most commentators of all colours and creeds agree that the lack of a father figure is a major issue on 'wayward' youth.

Whatever the admirable wishes of the founders and many supporters, BLM is tainted and many demonstrations show clear, organised anarchic disruptors advancing a marxist-anarchist agenda. For this alone the English Premier League and FA and players etc are fools: they fought and won to be able to wear the poppy but on this BLM celebration they are well behind the curve and it will lead to MORE trouble, not less. Why not just strengthen and continue the 'Kick it out', 'No Room for Racism' campaigns? Far better than taking 'a political turn', especially after the recent riots and statue-tumbling law-breaking, criminal damage.

Obmutescent over outrageous obsequious obfuscation...

---

Watched some footy last night; it was my last time for a while at least. I was, to say the least, stunned. I should have realised the other day, seeing the Liverfluke players taking a knee and other dim-witted overpaid fuckwits too: English Premier League players' names on the back of their shirts won't appear; the political divisive and sinister 'Black Lives Matter' will appear for 12 matches of the recently (yesterday) restarted season. After that, a 'Black Lives Matter' badge will be displayed for the rest of the season alongside another badge thanking NHS staff. All 20 EPL clubs are committed to "a global society of inclusion, respect, and equal opportunities for all, regardless of their colour or creed". Great, laudable, marvellous...but what does that have to do with BLM? Premier League kneels to the BLM tyrants, writes Gary Oliver on Conservative Woman. he is not wrong.

"Nonetheless, players who kneel in solidarity with teammates cannot all be comfortable endorsing the malevolent manifesto of Black Lives Matter. Certainly many football supporters will be dismayed by their club’s shirts being used to promote a group which denigrates British history and whose benign name belies its menacing intent."

Laws of the Game and Football Rules [English Football Association] IFAB Laws of the Game 2019-20, 20/21 [International Football Association Board] Law 4: The Players' Equipment, Section 5:

Slogans, statements, images and advertising: Interpreting the Law When interpreting whether a slogan, statement or image is permissible... 
... 'political' is less clear but slogans, statements or images related to the following are not permitted: any person(s), living or dead (unless part of the official competition name) any local, regional, national or international political party/organisation/group, etc. any local, regional or national government or any of its departments, offices or functions any organisation which is discriminatory any organisation whose aims/actions are likely to offend a notable number of people any specific political act/even

When commemorating a significant national or international event, the sensibilities of the opposing team (including its supporters) and the general public should be carefully considered.

Competition rules may contain further restrictions/limitations, particularly in relation to the size, number and position of permitted slogans, statements and images. It is recommended that disputes relating to slogans, statements or images be resolved prior to a match/competition taking place."

My emphasis. They can change the laws but they are currently ignoring them and in a way that is grossly and overtly political and divisive.  

BLM may have had good intentions when it began but that beginning was based on lies and race-baiters: Obama's "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon". Just one example: "While it would be naïve to suggest that there is no racism in the US criminal justice system, victim reports don’t support the idea that this is because of mass discrimination" [LINK]. BLM also believe in the disruption of "the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure". FFS, when most commentators of all colours and creeds agree that the lack of a father figure is a major issue on 'wayward' youth.

Whatever the admirable wishes of the founders and many supporters, BLM is tainted and many demonstrations show clear, organised anarchic disruptors advancing a marxist-anarchist agenda. For this alone the English Premier League and FA and players etc are fools: they fought and won to be able to wear the poppy but on this BLM celebration they are well behind the curve and it will lead to MORE trouble, not less. Why not just strengthen and continue the 'Kick it out', 'No Room for Racism' campaigns? Far better than taking 'a political turn', especially after the recent riots and statue-tumbling law-breaking, criminal damage.

Obviously orchestrated opposition odium...

---

Just a follow-on really, from Obvious opposition odium... had added updates but there were so many links thought it would be better making a further post...clearer than ever that the "white supremacy" COORDINATED attacks (inc. plethora of Charlottesville misquotes making headlines again) has replaced the failed attempt at getting The Donald impeached over "Russia".



End of previous blog-post and updates: 'FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not
Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and
abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes
spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'.
Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left.
They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say
it?' 



Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth
Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an
interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.



Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK] The War on White Supremacist Terror (sarc)

"The Times was hardly alone, of course. In the wake of the El Paso and Dayton shootings, the corporate media went into overdrive, pumping out “white supremacist terrorism” mass hysteria around the clock. The Guardian took a break from smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite to proclaim that El Paso was “Trump-inspired Terrorism.” The Sydney Morning Herald declared that the U.S. is now officially in the throes of a “white nationalist terrorism crisis.“ The Atlantic likened Trump to Anwar al-Awlaki, and assured us that “the worst is yet to come!“. Liberal journalists and politicians rushed onto Twitter to inform their followers that a global conspiracy of white supremacist terrorists “emboldened” or “inspired” by Donald Trump (who, remember, is a Russian secret agent) is threatening the very fabric of democracy, so it’s time to take some extraordinary measures!"

Nice.

Obviously orchestrated opposition odium...

---

Just a follow-on really, from Obvious opposition odium... had added updates but there were so many links thought it would be better making a further post...clearer than ever that the "white supremacy" COORDINATED attacks (inc. plethora of Charlottesville misquotes making headlines again) has replaced the failed attempt at getting The Donald impeached over "Russia".

End of previous blog-post and updates: 'FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'. Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left. They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say it?' 

Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.

Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK] The War on White Supremacist Terror (sarc)

"The Times was hardly alone, of course. In the wake of the El Paso and Dayton shootings, the corporate media went into overdrive, pumping out “white supremacist terrorism” mass hysteria around the clock. The Guardian took a break from smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite to proclaim that El Paso was “Trump-inspired Terrorism.” The Sydney Morning Herald declared that the U.S. is now officially in the throes of a “white nationalist terrorism crisis.“ The Atlantic likened Trump to Anwar al-Awlaki, and assured us that “the worst is yet to come!“. Liberal journalists and politicians rushed onto Twitter to inform their followers that a global conspiracy of white supremacist terrorists “emboldened” or “inspired” by Donald Trump (who, remember, is a Russian secret agent) is threatening the very fabric of democracy, so it’s time to take some extraordinary measures!"

Nice.

Obvious opposition odium...

---

White supremacists everywhere...it's the new buzzphrase in the USA, a clear and blatant - coordinated - effort by the Democrats, the fake-news-MSM and the carzy Left (can you tell the difference these days?) to demonise The Donald. Beto O'Rouke is on a misson, not sure what yet but obviously he is intentionally making headlines by spouting shit; it's anti-Trump shit so gets a lot of support [Guardian...source MSNBC]. I am guessing it's a last ditch effort to get near double figures in the 2020 POTUS Dem candidacy. Only this week: "I mean the president has not been shy. He’s not been saying this behind
closed doors. This is out in the open. All people of one religion,
inherently defective … should be banned from the shores of this
country,” O’Rourke said on MSNBC.
Did you note the strawmen raised there? "All"... "defective".
He went on: “The only modern Western democracy… that said anything close to this is
the Third Reich, Nazi Germany.”



Comparisons to Hitler are nothing new and even against Trump are nothing new (from 2016) but the lefty pricks in the USA - and especially it seems the failing MSM (CNN, MSNBC...looking at you) - seem to be attracting more dangerous ranters - encouraging them and certainly not admonishing them - than could be called a coincidence; now they have gone full retard: on NBC: "Bizarre - Former FBI Official: Trump Ordered Flags Flown At Half-Staff To Honor Hitler" [LINK]...because it is the 8th of the 8th (HH) and you'd think he'd be cut-off or questioned but already on twitter there are many saying how sinsiter that is...and they're serious!

Back in July, Democrat Steve Cohen: "It was more reminiscent of Germany during the beginnings of the Hitler regime."

This week, nutter Democrat Jerrold Nadler said "reminds me of the 1930s in Germany."...after setting up several strawmen in one sentence: "What's the connection between background checks and immigration
reform?"  on Morning Joe [who else, LOL] "That we have to keep guns out of the
hands out of the invading hordes of less-than human people coming across
our border? That's the implication." Invading hordes? less than human?



I mean, even more bizarre: MSNBC again: WTF? "MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace falsely claims that Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos” or Russian Impeachment Mika (neds a new tune: "the President of the United States of WANTING mass murders to happen." Funnily enough, that cahrge could be more logically applied to MSNBC reporters and staff and many others with trump Derangement Syndrome.



Even usually sensible sources are doing it: "The Rise of the American Gestapo: Has It Already Happened Here?" "Despite the finger-pointing and outcries of dismay from those who are watching the government discard the rule of law at every turn, the question is not whether Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler but whether the American Police State is the new Third Reich." [LINK]



FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not
Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and
abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes
spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'.
Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left.
They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say
it? 



Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth
Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an
interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.



Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK]

"The Times was hardly alone, of course. In the wake of the El Paso and Dayton shootings, the corporate media went into overdrive, pumping out “white supremacist terrorism” mass hysteria around the clock. The Guardian took a break from smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite to proclaim that El Paso was “Trump-inspired Terrorism.” The Sydney Morning Herald declared that the U.S. is now officially in the throes of a “white nationalist terrorism crisis.“ The Atlantic likened Trump to Anwar al-Awlaki, and assured us that “the worst is yet to come!“. Liberal journalists and politicians rushed onto Twitter to inform their followers that a global conspiracy of white supremacist terrorists “emboldened” or “inspired” by Donald Trump (who, remember, is a Russian secret agent) is threatening the very fabric of democracy, so it’s time to take some extraordinary measures!"

Nice.

Obvious opposition odium...

---

White supremacists everywhere...it's the new buzzphrase in the USA, a clear and blatant - coordinated - effort by the Democrats, the fake-news-MSM and the carzy Left (can you tell the difference these days?) to demonise The Donald. Beto O'Rouke is on a misson, not sure what yet but obviously he is intentionally making headlines by spouting shit; it's anti-Trump shit so gets a lot of support [Guardian...source MSNBC]. I am guessing it's a last ditch effort to get near double figures in the 2020 POTUS Dem candidacy. Only this week: "I mean the president has not been shy. He’s not been saying this behind closed doors. This is out in the open. All people of one religion, inherently defective … should be banned from the shores of this country,” O’Rourke said on MSNBC. Did you note the strawmen raised there? "All"... "defective". He went on: “The only modern Western democracy… that said anything close to this is the Third Reich, Nazi Germany.”

Comparisons to Hitler are nothing new and even against Trump are nothing new (from 2016) but the lefty pricks in the USA - and especially it seems the failing MSM (CNN, MSNBC...looking at you) - seem to be attracting more dangerous ranters - encouraging them and certainly not admonishing them - than could be called a coincidence; now they have gone full retard: on NBC: "Bizarre - Former FBI Official: Trump Ordered Flags Flown At Half-Staff To Honor Hitler" [LINK]...because it is the 8th of the 8th (HH) and you'd think he'd be cut-off or questioned but already on twitter there are many saying how sinsiter that is...and they're serious! Back in July, Democrat Steve Cohen: "It was more reminiscent of Germany during the beginnings of the Hitler regime." This week, nutter Democrat Jerrold Nadler said "reminds me of the 1930s in Germany."...after setting up several strawmen in one sentence: "What's the connection between background checks and immigration reform?"  on Morning Joe [who else, LOL] "That we have to keep guns out of the hands out of the invading hordes of less-than human people coming across our border? That's the implication." Invading hordes? less than human?

I mean, even more bizarre: MSNBC again: WTF? "MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace falsely claims that Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos” or Russian Impeachment Mika (neds a new tune: "the President of the United States of WANTING mass murders to happen." Funnily enough, that cahrge could be more logically applied to MSNBC reporters and staff and many others with trump Derangement Syndrome.

Even usually sensible sources are doing it: "The Rise of the American Gestapo: Has It Already Happened Here?" "Despite the finger-pointing and outcries of dismay from those who are watching the government discard the rule of law at every turn, the question is not whether Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler but whether the American Police State is the new Third Reich." [LINK]

FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'. Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left. They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say it? 

Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.

Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK]

"The Times was hardly alone, of course. In the wake of the El Paso and Dayton shootings, the corporate media went into overdrive, pumping out “white supremacist terrorism” mass hysteria around the clock. The Guardian took a break from smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite to proclaim that El Paso was “Trump-inspired Terrorism.” The Sydney Morning Herald declared that the U.S. is now officially in the throes of a “white nationalist terrorism crisis.“ The Atlantic likened Trump to Anwar al-Awlaki, and assured us that “the worst is yet to come!“. Liberal journalists and politicians rushed onto Twitter to inform their followers that a global conspiracy of white supremacist terrorists “emboldened” or “inspired” by Donald Trump (who, remember, is a Russian secret agent) is threatening the very fabric of democracy, so it’s time to take some extraordinary measures!"

Nice.

Obambulating Obama...

---

Obama,  "a restoration of honesty and decency and lawfulness in our government" (snigger) clearly part of the problem; most definitely NOT part of the solution. Clearly his horrendously rabble-rousing comments - apart from being part of the permanent protest - are intended to try to spark the stalling Democrats for the congressional mid-term elections in November but he has just put a massive target on his back. Oh, can I say that? Or is it still racist (last paragraph), despite being what anyone could say about anyone, when it's directed at Obama it must be racist.

Obambulating Obama...

---

Obama,  "a restoration of honesty and decency and lawfulness in our government" (snigger) clearly part of the problem; most definitely NOT part of the solution. Clearly his horrendously rabble-rousing comments - apart from being part of the permanent protest - are intended to try to spark the stalling Democrats for the congressional mid-term elections in November but he has just put a massive target on his back. Oh, can I say that? Or is it still racist (last paragraph), despite being what anyone could say about anyone, when it's directed at Obama it must be racist.

Overwhelming oppression offence...

---

United Nations rapporteur Tendayi Achiume, in her end of mission statement, wants "to conclude with a celebration of the resilience of racial and ethnic minority communities, including those among them who, notwithstanding the overwhelming challenges and oppression they face, continue to fight for racial equality in the UK": I guess we're all bigots and Brexit and austerity have made it worse. "As a start, I recommend the full implementation of the Lammy Review recommendations"...ROFL, ah, the 'lamm-basted' painfully poor review that was rightly ripped a new arsehole recently? Raheem (on Twitter) has it spot on:

This “UN expert” can fuck right off. pic.twitter.com/o2N08JSyl0

— Raheem (@RaheemKassam) 11 May 2018

Regarding race and tolerance etc I doubt things have changed that much since THIS was published five years back, or the findings of over 85,000 people from 61 countries between 2014 and 2015 HERE. Do UN 'rapporteurs' actually go to really racist countries for their 'missions'? I think we know the answer to that.

Overwhelming oppression offence...

---

United Nations rapporteur Tendayi Achiume, in her end of mission statement, wants "to conclude with a celebration of the resilience of racial and ethnic minority communities, including those among them who, notwithstanding the overwhelming challenges and oppression they face, continue to fight for racial equality in the UK": I guess we're all bigots and Brexit and austerity have made it worse. "As a start, I recommend the full implementation of the Lammy Review recommendations"...ROFL, ah, the 'lamm-basted' painfully poor review that was rightly ripped a new arsehole recently? Raheem (on Twitter) has it spot on:

This “UN expert” can fuck right off. pic.twitter.com/o2N08JSyl0

— Raheem (@RaheemKassam) 11 May 2018

Regarding race and tolerance etc I doubt things have changed that much since THIS was published five years back, or the findings of over 85,000 people from 61 countries between 2014 and 2015 HERE. Do UN 'rapporteurs' actually go to really racist countries for their 'missions'? I think we know the answer to that.

Obama's obvallate OFA 'outrage' operations...

---

Much as New Labour in the UK had a 'stay-behind' army of civil servants and quangocrats sticking spokes in the government wheels and still working for their UK-destroying agenda, so too in the US the Trump administration [link and quote added 13/02] will be fighting an internal war (and worse) for at least a year.

"Former Democratic senator and 2016 presidential candidate Jim Webb said there is a campaign among D.C. insiders and in the media to 'personally discredit' President Trump and the people around him."

On top of that - as Paul Sperry writes - there is a veritable army of agitators in multiple protest groups [Link NYP] - a "network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action" run by various ex aides and staffers: "Obama will be overseeing it all from a shadow White House located within two miles of Trump. It features a mansion, which he’s fortifying with construction of a tall brick perimeter..."



This is a good follow on from Sperry's 2015 article about Obama bankrolling of constant protest. His presidency was "pockmarked by rioting, looting and protests. That's no coincidence. It's what the former community organizer sought from Day One." He "has encouraged the nonstop civil unrest exhausting the nation."...He "egged on both BLM and OWS [no relation!] protesters."

"Chronic social irritation can do lasting damage to the fabric of a nation. By falsely accusing people of racism...or sexism...or homophobia...or Islamophobia — or whatever other 'ism' or phobia they come up with next — these agitators are creating angst and hatred in people's hearts that wasn't there previously." 




It reminded me of Obama's offspring II... ("…When there is a lack of honor in government, the morals of the whole people are poisoned") with his blatant stirring of racial tension.

Obama's obvallate OFA 'outrage' operations...

---

Much as New Labour in the UK had a 'stay-behind' army of civil servants and quangocrats sticking spokes in the government wheels and still working for their UK-destroying agenda, so too in the US the Trump administration [link and quote added 13/02] will be fighting an internal war (and worse) for at least a year.

"Former Democratic senator and 2016 presidential candidate Jim Webb said there is a campaign among D.C. insiders and in the media to 'personally discredit' President Trump and the people around him."

On top of that - as Paul Sperry writes - there is a veritable army of agitators in multiple protest groups [Link NYP] - a "network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action" run by various ex aides and staffers: "Obama will be overseeing it all from a shadow White House located within two miles of Trump. It features a mansion, which he’s fortifying with construction of a tall brick perimeter..."

This is a good follow on from Sperry's 2015 article about Obama bankrolling of constant protest. His presidency was "pockmarked by rioting, looting and protests. That's no coincidence. It's what the former community organizer sought from Day One." He "has encouraged the nonstop civil unrest exhausting the nation."...He "egged on both BLM and OWS [no relation!] protesters." "Chronic social irritation can do lasting damage to the fabric of a nation. By falsely accusing people of racism...or sexism...or homophobia...or Islamophobia — or whatever other 'ism' or phobia they come up with next — these agitators are creating angst and hatred in people's hearts that wasn't there previously." 

It reminded me of Obama's offspring II... ("…When there is a lack of honor in government, the morals of the whole people are poisoned") with his blatant stirring of racial tension.

Obama's offspring II...

---

[edited 11:45, reedited for typos!] "…When there is a lack of honor in government, the morals of the whole people are poisoned." ** I wrote this post a week or so ago and decided not to post it but it does tie in with current news. IMHO Benghazi was far worse than Watergate, far worse than the Iran Contra affair. How POTUS "and top administration officials deliberately and repeatedly lied to the American public...[aiding?] a well-armed al-Qaeda army that is already attacking our interests and fueling conflicts worldwide" [Link]. Well, including an administration being caught red-handed manipulating the IRS for political purposes and taking into account the multiple Impeachable Offenses "that the president's defenders will find troublesome", what could be worse? Fomenting internal strife would be worse; you maybe think you spot Ows hyperbole but... reading the opening quote to this blog-post and recalling that Obama decided to stir up racial tensions (at the time two weeks after the event and all the while knowing what the police knew) he said "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon"; later, six days after the George Zimmerman not-guilty verdict he does it again "Trayvon Martin could have been me thirty-five years ago" (ha!). I thought these were just typical of a plethora of Obama's seemingly cretinous statements but I hope it isn't more sinister and part of a general symptom of virulent black racism being the new normal (to use Colin Flaherty's phrase):

'Black mob violence is now so frequent and intense that even big city editors can’t keep it out of the news anymore. [...] The psychiatrists tell us we are only as sick as our secrets. Nothing inspires more secrecy than race. And no one is trying to keep the secrets more than the liberals who run the newsrooms and city halls across the country.'

Colin's book certainly hit home last year and continues to do so.  "But who’s to say what would happen if black America exerted even half of the emotional fervor and brainpower it does over cases like Martin’s to thinking about how to keep black boys from going wrong?" - John McWhorter ...with links to how the numbers don't lie. "The media needs to be as honest with black people as we need to be with ourselves. No group gets ahead by turning away from its real problems."



I enjoyed the 'Conversation' HERE. First Joel Pollak was saying the the media tit-for-tat was pointless: 'this is a game without winners. I'd rather not play'. "Yes, there is a crime problem in the black community. Yes, there is an failure among black leaders, from Obama on down, to do anything about it. That story doesn't need new white victims to make it potent." Then John Hayward: "What we need is a full frontal assault on gang culture, something on the scale of the media-savvy full-spectrum assault on George Zimmerman's imaginary racism...." and finally, with key points if you ask me, Debra Heine: "But when an incident like the Trayvon Martin killing happens, what we see is a whirlwind of political activity - the race hustlers move in with their bull-horns, the media runs with their racialist narrative, and white liberals, steeped in white guilt, try to outdo each other proving how morally outraged they are about the incident... A sort of mass hysteria ensues. It takes a sort of hysterical blindness not to see the evidence".



Now, before the shrieks of hysteria start I would like to add that statistically the rate of violent crime in the USA - albeit high by first-world standards - is falling and the homicide rate has been falling steadily for centuries when population is considered (an aside: how weird is this?) My point is why does Obama accidentally on purpose always make things worse, surely all these young men - that would look like his son if he had one - need to be told something more than excuses from the race industry hustlers and seeming encouragement from the president; surely he's not a racist? He could be but it certainly seems like everyone who disagrees with him is.



** 'Our Greatest Danger' (Herbert Hoover 31st POTUS)



Update 8 pm BST: that 2nd last link names 15 moronic things that liberals blame on racism against Obama: now it's moronic 16.

Obama's offspring II...

---

[edited 11:45, reedited for typos!] "…When there is a lack of honor in government, the morals of the whole people are poisoned." ** I wrote this post a week or so ago and decided not to post it but it does tie in with current news. IMHO Benghazi was far worse than Watergate, far worse than the Iran Contra affair. How POTUS "and top administration officials deliberately and repeatedly lied to the American public...[aiding?] a well-armed al-Qaeda army that is already attacking our interests and fueling conflicts worldwide" [Link]. Well, including an administration being caught red-handed manipulating the IRS for political purposes and taking into account the multiple Impeachable Offenses "that the president's defenders will find troublesome", what could be worse? Fomenting internal strife would be worse; you maybe think you spot Ows hyperbole but... reading the opening quote to this blog-post and recalling that Obama decided to stir up racial tensions (at the time two weeks after the event and all the while knowing what the police knew) he said "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon"; later, six days after the George Zimmerman not-guilty verdict he does it again "Trayvon Martin could have been me thirty-five years ago" (ha!). I thought these were just typical of a plethora of Obama's seemingly cretinous statements but I hope it isn't more sinister and part of a general symptom of virulent black racism being the new normal (to use Colin Flaherty's phrase):

'Black mob violence is now so frequent and intense that even big city editors can’t keep it out of the news anymore. [...] The psychiatrists tell us we are only as sick as our secrets. Nothing inspires more secrecy than race. And no one is trying to keep the secrets more than the liberals who run the newsrooms and city halls across the country.'

Colin's book certainly hit home last year and continues to do so.  "But who’s to say what would happen if black America exerted even half of the emotional fervor and brainpower it does over cases like Martin’s to thinking about how to keep black boys from going wrong?" - John McWhorter ...with links to how the numbers don't lie. "The media needs to be as honest with black people as we need to be with ourselves. No group gets ahead by turning away from its real problems."

I enjoyed the 'Conversation' HERE. First Joel Pollak was saying the the media tit-for-tat was pointless: 'this is a game without winners. I'd rather not play'. "Yes, there is a crime problem in the black community. Yes, there is an failure among black leaders, from Obama on down, to do anything about it. That story doesn't need new white victims to make it potent." Then John Hayward: "What we need is a full frontal assault on gang culture, something on the scale of the media-savvy full-spectrum assault on George Zimmerman's imaginary racism...." and finally, with key points if you ask me, Debra Heine: "But when an incident like the Trayvon Martin killing happens, what we see is a whirlwind of political activity - the race hustlers move in with their bull-horns, the media runs with their racialist narrative, and white liberals, steeped in white guilt, try to outdo each other proving how morally outraged they are about the incident... A sort of mass hysteria ensues. It takes a sort of hysterical blindness not to see the evidence".

Now, before the shrieks of hysteria start I would like to add that statistically the rate of violent crime in the USA - albeit high by first-world standards - is falling and the homicide rate has been falling steadily for centuries when population is considered (an aside: how weird is this?) My point is why does Obama accidentally on purpose always make things worse, surely all these young men - that would look like his son if he had one - need to be told something more than excuses from the race industry hustlers and seeming encouragement from the president; surely he's not a racist? He could be but it certainly seems like everyone who disagrees with him is.

** 'Our Greatest Danger' (Herbert Hoover 31st POTUS)

Update 8 pm BST: that 2nd last link names 15 moronic things that liberals blame on racism against Obama: now it's moronic 16.

Overt outrage III...

---

Where Everybody Matters...Oh dear (serious). Anyway, I'm sure it's not a connection to the following but the council in Rotherham is 92% Labour. A few bits of news from the last few months first: "Rotherham sex abuse: More girls at risk" [BBC], "Rotherham: the authorities systematically failed to prevent the abuse of dozens of teenage girls" [SW], "Vulnerable white girl, known to have been abused from the age of 12, was offered Urdu and Punjabi lessons by Rotherham Council to 'educate her'", and "Police turned a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse of white girls by gangs of largely Pakistani men for more than a decade" [DM], 'Rotherham council hide and change key facts about men suspected of grooming girl for sex who they later murdered' [Times £] . We all know it has happened in many other British (and European...and everywhere we find this culture?) cities. Now, we read, a couple from near Rotherham who had foster children had them taken away after it was discovered they were...wait for it...supporters of UKIP!

"They took on the three children — a baby girl, a boy and an older girl, who were all from an ethnic minority and a troubled family background — in September in an emergency placement.
They believe that the youngsters thrived in their care. The couple were described as 'exemplary' foster parents: the baby put on weight and the older girl even began calling them 'mum and dad'"

Nigel Farage, UKIP's leader, called it "a bloody outrage", he's right. And the conspiracy theorist in me draws your attention to he fact that next week there is a by-election in Rotherham (Denis MacShane's seat).



Updates Sunday: 1. Interesting article from Andrew Gilligan in the Telegraph re the voting issues, labour's candidate and numbers in Rotherham [Link]. 2. Rotherham Politics: needs reading, and D Jones' comment on that blog-post.

Overt outrage III...

---

Where Everybody Matters...Oh dear (serious). Anyway, I'm sure it's not a connection to the following but the council in Rotherham is 92% Labour. A few bits of news from the last few months first: "Rotherham sex abuse: More girls at risk" [BBC], "Rotherham: the authorities systematically failed to prevent the abuse of dozens of teenage girls" [SW], "Vulnerable white girl, known to have been abused from the age of 12, was offered Urdu and Punjabi lessons by Rotherham Council to 'educate her'", and "Police turned a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse of white girls by gangs of largely Pakistani men for more than a decade" [DM], 'Rotherham council hide and change key facts about men suspected of grooming girl for sex who they later murdered' [Times £] . We all know it has happened in many other British (and European...and everywhere we find this culture?) cities. Now, we read, a couple from near Rotherham who had foster children had them taken away after it was discovered they were...wait for it...supporters of UKIP!

"They took on the three children — a baby girl, a boy and an older girl, who were all from an ethnic minority and a troubled family background — in September in an emergency placement. They believe that the youngsters thrived in their care. The couple were described as 'exemplary' foster parents: the baby put on weight and the older girl even began calling them 'mum and dad'"

Nigel Farage, UKIP's leader, called it "a bloody outrage", he's right. And the conspiracy theorist in me draws your attention to he fact that next week there is a by-election in Rotherham (Denis MacShane's seat).

Updates Sunday: 1. Interesting article from Andrew Gilligan in the Telegraph re the voting issues, labour's candidate and numbers in Rotherham [Link]. 2. Rotherham Politics: needs reading, and D Jones' comment on that blog-post.